🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive action to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and parents are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will set a precedent for other nations.

European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward similar measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and platforms are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy is expected to be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban could be "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a bill raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," commented one parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a possible ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive evidence".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the government pledged to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. A prominent charity founded by the family of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the failure of the social media companies to build platforms and apps that are safe and fit for minors," stated a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the state level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill barring children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from various individuals to follow the Australian path, a federal ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Beyond the West, further states are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global bodies take a more cautious position. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of Australia and its followers show that policymakers globally are increasingly willing to delay for the industry to act voluntarily.